PracticeOS Command Center

From unreadable payer files to a revenue action plan.

Payers published massive machine-readable rate files. Most practices never knew they existed, and even fewer could turn them into action. PracticeOS translates the mess into CPT gaps, payer targets, annual uplift, memos, appeals, recovery paths, and renewal strategy.

Total modeled opportunity Demo account
$184,320

Modeled annual uplift across top CPT opportunities using visible gaps, estimated monthly volume, and payer-specific action paths.

Monthly$15,360
Top payerAetna
Top code98941

Your practice may be doing the same work for less money than nearby peers.

PracticeOS shows where the spread appears, which payer is creating it, what it may mean annually, and which tool should be used next.

MRF files
Readable rates
CPT gaps
Action plan

Rate Intelligence

Every important CPT code gets a money story.

Formula: gap per unit × monthly units × 12. Real accounts should only show real payer/CPT rates or mark fields unavailable.

CPT
Description
Your rate
Peer target
Monthly units
Annual uplift
Status
98941
Chiro manipulation, 3-4 regions
$42.18
$58.25
420
$80,993
High gap
97110
Therapeutic exercise
$38.40
$49.10
310
$39,804
Memo ready
97140
Manual therapy
$34.75
$45.20
260
$32,604
Review
99213
Established patient visit
$71.20
$82.85
185
$25,863
Renewal
Demo math shown for product storytelling. Production data must be NPI-specific, source-labeled, and never invented.

Practice Audit

The whole practice ranked by impact, urgency, and confidence.

The audit turns raw rate intelligence into a decision queue. Highest dollar impact first, lowest confidence flagged for review.

Audit opportunity $184,320

Modeled annual upside across payer/CPT opportunities.

Highest-confidence action Aetna Memo

Largest spread, strong volume, clean CPT story.

Missing input Contract dates

Needed for renewal and termination window strategy.

1Aetna 98941 rate gap$80,993/yr
2Blue Shield renewal opportunity$49,800/yr
3Cigna therapy code variance$36,100/yr
4Appeals/recovery review$18,600/yr

Leverage Memo

A payer-ready story, not a spreadsheet.

Modeled value: if a memo helps move only one payer’s top-code gap, this demo account shows a possible $72,400 annual target.

Aetna Commercial Rate Review

Our analysis identified material variance on high-volume musculoskeletal CPT codes relative to available payer and peer-rate context.

  • CPT 98941 modeled opportunity: $80,993 annually.
  • CPT 97110 modeled opportunity: $39,804 annually.
  • Recommended action: payer counteroffer packet.
Memo target valueAction priority
Aetna
$72.4K
Blue Shield
$49.8K
Cigna
$36.1K
Next: Generate the Aetna memo first, then use renewal dates to time the conversation.

Contract Review

Know when and how to use the data.

Rate intelligence is strongest when paired with renewal timing, notice windows, payer terms, and clean counteroffer structure.

Renewal window92 days

Good timing for Aetna and Blue Shield counteroffer preparation.

Rate exhibit riskHigh

Top codes appear materially below modeled peer target.

Modeled contract upside$49,800/yr

Example value from one payer renewal motion.

Denial Appeals

Turn avoidable denials into structured appeals.

Use payer behavior, CPT context, and prior claim patterns to draft appeal packets and track recovery status.

Denied97110 · Aetna

Medical necessity language mismatch.

$6,240 modeled recovery
Denied97140 · Cigna

Modifier documentation review needed.

$4,880 modeled recovery
Denied99213 · UHC

Bundling issue, appeal draft ready.

$7,480 modeled recovery

Recovery Radar

Find the dollars already leaking through the cracks.

Recovery Radar prioritizes underpayments and missed follow-ups by payer, code, age, and estimated recoverability.

30-day queue$9,800

High-confidence items to pursue now.

90-day queue$21,400

Older underpayments requiring documentation.

Total modeled recovery$31,200

Example recoverable amount across this demo practice.

Claim Scrubber

Prevent leakage before claims go out.

The scrubber checks high-risk codes, payer-specific behavior, modifier issues, and avoidable denial patterns.

Warning97140 missing modifier context for payer pattern.Fix before submit
Watch99213 bundled with therapy sequence on UHC.Review
Clean98941 documentation pattern acceptable.Ready

Renewal Radar

The worst time to discover a payer gap is after the window closes.

Renewal Radar connects rate gaps to contract timing so the practice acts before leverage expires.

NowAetna memo prep

$72.4K modeled payer opportunity.

30 daysBlue Shield review

Contract exhibit and renewal language check.

60 daysCigna counteroffer

Therapy code target-rate package.

90 daysRenewal meeting

Bring payer-ready data packet.

Data Integrity

Sell hard. Never fake the math.

If a rate, volume, contract term, payer file, or benchmark is missing, PracticeOS should clearly say unavailable and request the missing input.

Source-labeled payer data
NPI-specific account context
Manual volume input when missing
No PHI required for preview
Unavailable means unavailable

Trust language

This is why doctors can believe it.

PracticeOS is not making up revenue. It translates available payer transparency data into practice-specific analysis, then asks for missing practice inputs like volume and contract timing before showing final opportunity values.